Monitoring SARS CoV-2 antibodies positivity in healthcare workers after inactivated CoronaVac vaccine

Introduction In this study, we aimed to monitor anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies positivity in healthcare workers (HCWs) vaccinated with two doses of inactivated CoronaVac (Sinovac, China) vaccine. Methods Overall, 242 volunteer HCWs were included. Of the participants, 193 were HCWs without history of prior documented COVID-19 (Group 1), while 49 had history of prior documented COVID-19 before vaccination (Group 2). The participants were followed up for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies positivity at four different blood sampling time points (immediately before the second vaccine dose and at the 1st, 3rd months and 141-150 days after the second dose). We investigated the serum IgG class antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 RBD region and IgG class antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) method using commercial kits. Results We found positive serum anti-RBD IgG antibody in 76.4% of the participants (71% in Group 1;98% in Group 2) 28 days after the first dose. When the antibody levels of the groups were compared at the four blood sampling time points, Group 2 anti-RBD IgG levels were found to be significantly higher than those in Group 1 at all follow-up time points. Although anti-RBD IgG positivity persisted in 95.6% of all participants in the last blood sampling time point, a significant decrease was observed in antibody levels compared to the previous blood sampling time point. Anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibody was positive in 12 (6.2%) of participants in Group 1 and 32 (65.3%) in Group 2 at day 28 after the first dose. At the fourth blood sampling time point, anti-nucleocapsid antibodies were found to be positive in a total of 20 (9.7%) subjects, 10 (6.1%) in Group 1 and 10 (23.8%) in Group 2. Conclusions In this study, it was determined that serum antibody levels decreased in both groups after the third month after the second dose in HCWs vaccinated with CoronaVac vaccine.Copyright © GERMS 2022.

Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Developed Following Covid-19 Vaccine

A 40-year-old male patient, an office worker, is a hospital staff. He applied with the complaint of sudden onset of blurred vision in the right eye. He stated that he had the first dose of inactivated covid vaccine (sinovac) 4 days ago in his story. In his examination, his vision was 0.5 in the right eye, 1.0 in the left eye, and his intraocular pressure was in both eyes. It was at the level of 15 mmHg. Biomicroscopically, the anterior segment looked natural. CSC was diagnosed in the FFA and OCT examinations.Treatment with oral acetazolamide (2x250 mg), topical nepafanac (4x1) was started. On the 13th day of the treatment, there was insufficient improvement in clinical findings, and oral acetazolamide was used. The dose was reduced (2x125 mg), oral epleronone (50 mg) was added. On the 70th day of the treatment, the vision in the right eye increased to full level in the control examination and it was observed that the retina returned to its normal appearance in the OCT examination.Copyright © 2023 Gazi Eye Foundation. All rights reserved.

Impact of Health Workers' Choice of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster on Immunization Levels in Istanbul, Turkey.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding short- and medium-term IgG antibody levels after the CoronaVac and BNT162b2 vaccines. This study aimed to investigate the antibody responses of health workers who initially received two doses of CoronaVac one month apart followed by a booster dose of either CoronaVac or BNT162b2, as well as determine whether either vaccine provided superior results. METHODS: This research represents the second phase of a mixed-methods vaccine cohort study and was conducted between July 2021 and February 2022. The participants (n = 117) were interviewed in person and blood samples were collected before and at 1 and 6 months after the booster vaccination. RESULTS: BNT162b2 was found to have greater immunogenic potential than CoronaVac (p < 0.001). Health workers without chronic disease exhibited statistically significant increases in antibody levels after both vaccines (p < 0.001), whereas only BNT162b2 caused a significant increase in antibody levels in participants with chronic disease (p < 0.001). Samples obtained before and at 1 and 6 months after the booster vaccination revealed no age- or sex-based differences in IgG-inducing potential for either vaccine (p > 0.05). Antibody levels were comparable in both vaccine groups before the booster regardless of COVID-19 history (p > 0.05); however, antibody levels were significantly higher after the BNT162b2 booster at 1 month (<0.001) and at 6 months, except among participants who had a positive history of COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that even a single booster dose of BNT162b2 after initial vaccination with CoronaVac provides a protective advantage against COVID-19, especially for risk groups such as health workers and those with chronic diseases.

Efficacy of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

This retrospective observational study is aimed to determine the efficacy of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and CoronaVac (Sinovac) vaccines against symptomatic or severe disease in COVID-19-diagnosed patients. The secondary aim was to define the differences between vaccinated and un-vaccinated patients in terms of age, comorbidities and course of the disease, and to determine the survival rates. Of the 1463 PCR-positive patients, 55.3 % were vaccinated, and 44.7 % were unvaccinated. While 959 patients had mild-moderate symptoms, 504 patients had severe-critical symptoms and were treated in the intensive care unit. There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the type and doses of vaccines between the patient groups (p = 0.021). The rate of receiving 2 doses of Biontech was 18.9 % in the mild-moderate patient group but lower in the severe patient group (12.6 %). The rate of two doses of Sinovac and two doses of Biontech vaccine (four doses of vaccine) was 5 % in the mild-moderate patient group and 1.9 % in the severe patient group. The mortality rates were statistically significantly different (p < 0.001) between the patient groups: 65.3 % in the severe patient group and 1 % in the mild-moderate patient group. The multivariate model showed that the mortality risk of the unvaccinated patients was 1.5 times higher than the vaccinated ones (p = 0.042). In addition to being unvaccinated, advanced age, coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and obesity were found to be associated with higher mortality risk. Besides, the reduction in mortality rate was more evident in individuals vaccinated with at least 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine than in CoronaVac group.

Effectiveness of mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines: A test-negative study in an infection-naïve Hong Kong population.

OBJECTIVE: Assess real-world effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19. METHODS: A test-negative study was conducted in January-May 2022 during an Omicron BA.2 wave in Hong Kong. COVID-19 was identified by RT-PCR. 1-1 case-control matching was based on propensity score with vaccine effectiveness adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Altogether, 1781 cases and 1737 controls aged 3-105 years were analysed. The mean lag time from the last dose of vaccination to testing for SARS-CoV-2 was 133.9 (SD: 84.4) days. Two doses of either vaccine within 180 days offered a low effectiveness against COVID-19 of all severity combined (VEadj [95% CI] for BNT162b2: 27.0% [4.2-44.5], CoronaVac: 22.9% [1.3-39.7]), and further decreased after 180 days. Two doses of CoronaVac were poorly protective 39.5% [4.9-62.5] against severe diseases for age ≥ 60 years, but the effectiveness increased substantially after the third dose (79.1% [25.7-96.7]). Two doses of BNT162b2 protected age ≥ 60 years against severe diseases (79.3% [47.2, 93.9]); however, the uptake was not high enough to assess three doses. CONCLUSIONS: The current real-world analysis indicates a high vaccine effectiveness of three doses of inactivated virus (CoronaVac) vaccines against Omicron variant, whereas the effectiveness of two doses is suboptimal.

Third Booster Dose Vaccine against Sars-Cov-2 in Primary Sjogren's Syndrome: Longitudinal Cohort from the Safer Study

Objectives: Few studies evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of different COVID-19 vaccine platforms in patients with primary Sjogren's Syndrome (pSS). The present study aims to assess the immunogenicity through anti-spike IgG antibodies after the COVID-19 vaccine dose in heterologous groups compared to homologous regimen in patients with pSS. Method(s): These data are from the SAFER study: 'Safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in rheumatic disease', a real-life phase IV multicenter longitudinal study, evaluating patients since before the first dose. Pregnant women, those with a history of serious adverse events prior to any vaccine, and those with other causes of immunosuppression were excluded. Patients with pSS > 18 years, classified according to ACR/EULAR 2016 classification criteria were included. Antibodies against the Receptor Binding Domain - RBD portion of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (IgG-S) were measured by chemiluminescence (Architect SARS-CoV-2 Quanti II, Abbott), before the first dose and 28 days after the 2nd and 3rd dose. Seropositivity was defined as IgG-Spike titers >=7.1 BAU/mL. Patients received adenoviral vector (ChAdOx1, Astrazeneca), mRNA (Pfizer) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 (Coronavac). Non-parametric methods were used. The alpha level of significance was set at 5%. Result(s): 56 participants received 3 doses, 46 +/- 11 years old, disease duration 7.62 years, 92.9% female, 41.1% White and 55.4% Mixed. The homologous third-booster dose group (n = 15, all ChAdOx1) and heterologous group (n = 41) were homogeneous for age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities, medication and baseline IgG-S median [IQR] titers. After primary vaccination (2 doses) IgG-S median and titers [IQR] were similar in homologous and heterologous groups (373.03 [179.58, 843.92] vs. 473.36 [119.05, 1059.60], p = 0.705). Third-booster dose induced higher IgG-S median [IQR] titers compared to only 2 doses (1229.54 [333.55, 4365.47] vs 464.95 [140.42, 1015.25], p alpha 0.001). Heterologous 3rd-booster induced higher IgG-S median [IQR] titers than homologous scheme with ChAdOx1 (1779.52 [335.83, 4523.89] vs 730.76 [303.37, 1858.98], p = 0.150), Fig 1 and 2, although not statistically significant. Conclusion(s): Third booster dose induced higher humoral immune response compared to two doses whichmay improve protection against COVID-19 in patients with pSS. Although not statistically significant, the response to the heterologous scheme tended to be better than the response to the homologous booster vaccination, which heterologous booster scheme tended to respond better than homologous booster vaccination, which is relevant in this immunosuppressed population. Increasing the sample size will help clarify this issue. .

Safety and Immunogenicity of Coronavac and Chadox1 Vaccines against Sars-Cov-2 in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Brazilian Multicentric Study

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Method(s): These data are from the 'SAFER (Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Diseases)' study, a Brazilian multicentric longitudinal phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine in immunomediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs). Adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA were assessed after two doses of ChAdOx1 or CoronaVac. Stratification of postvaccination AEs was performed using a diary, filled out daily. The titers of neutralizing antibodies against the receptor-biding domain of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-RBD) were measured by chemilumine scence test after each dose of immunizers. Proportions between groups were compared using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) before and after vaccination was assessed using the McNemar test. Result(s): A total of 188 patients with RA were included in the study, most of them were female. CoronaVac was used in 109 patients and ChAdOx1 in 79. Only mild AEs were observed. The more common AEs after the first dose were pain at injection site (46,7%), headache (39,4%), arthralgia (39,4%) and myalgia (30,5%), and ChAdOx1 had a higher frequency of pain at the injection site (66% vs 32 %, p alpha 0.001) arthralgia (62% vs 22%, p alpha 0.001) and myalgia (45% vs 20%, p alpha 0.001) compared to CoronaVac. The more common AEs after the second dose were pain at the injection site (37%), arthralgia (31%), myalgia (23%) and headache (21%). Arthralgia (41,42 % vs 25 %, p = 0.02) and pain at injection site (51,43% vs 27%, p = 0.001) were more common with ChAdOx1. No patients had a flare after vaccination. The titers of anti-RBDafter two doses of ChAdOx1 were higher compared to two doses of CoronaVac (6,03 BAU/mL vs 4,67 BAU/mL, p alpha 0,001). Conclusion(s): The frequency of local adverse effects, particularly pain at injection site, was high. AEs were more frequent with ChAdOx1, especially after the first dose. The use of the immunizers dis not change the degree of inflammatory activity of the disease. In patients with RA, ChAdOx1 was more immunogenic than CoronaVac. .

Safety and Efficacy of Covid-19 Immunization in Systemic Vasculitides - a Multicentric Cohort

Objectives: Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs) develop more severe outcomes of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recent studies have contributed to understand the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in IMRDs, suggesting that different diseases and therapies may interfere on immunization efficacy. In this study we analyze the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with Systemic Vasculitides (VASC), the rate of COVID-19 and the frequency of disease relapse following immunization. Method(s): We included patients with VASC (n = 73), a subgroup of the SAFER study (Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease), a longitudinal, multicenter, Brazilian cohort.We analyzed the geometric means of IgG antibody against receptor-biding domain of protein spike of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-RBD) after two shots of CoronaVac (Inactivated vaccine), ChadOx-1 (AstraZeneca) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). IgG anti-RBD was measured by chemiluminescence test. We assessed new-onset COVID-19 episodes, adverse events (AE) and disease activity for each VASC. Result(s): The sample included Behcet's disease (BD) (n = 41), Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (n = 15), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) (n = 14), polyarteritis nodosa (n = 7) and other small vessel VASC(n = 6). The majority of patients were female (69%) without comorbidities (49%) and a median age of 37 years. The most common medication was conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, followed by biologic drugs. No patient received rituximab at baseline. Most patients received CoronaVac (n = 25) or ChadOx-1 (n = 36), while four received BNT162b2. Baseline IgG-RBD means were 1.34 BAU/mL. They increased to 3.89 and 5.29 BAU/mL after the 1st and 2nd vaccine dose, respectively. ChadOx-1 had higher antibody titers than CoronaVac (p = 0.002). There were no differences between different VASC. There were 3 cases of COVID-19 after immunization with CoronaVac. BD patients had a tendency for more cutaneous-articular activity following ChadOx-1. There were no severe relapses and no serious adverse events. Conclusion(s): Our results show the safety of different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in VASC population. A progressive increase of IgG-RBD antibodies was observed after each dose. ChadOx-1 led to higher IgG-RBDgeometricmeans compared toCoronaVac. Finally, even though ChadOx-1 presented a tendency of triggering mild disease activity, there were no significant disease activity following vaccination in VASC patients. .

PANLAR 2023 Abstracts

The proceedings contain 238 papers. The topics discussed include: treatment with tofacitinib attenuates muscle loss through Myogenin activation in collagen-induced arthritis;plasma cytokine levels in a group of Colombian patients with moderate systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis;prevalence of neoplastic disease in patients with systemic sclerosis in a south American cohort;characterization of rheumatic manifestations in patients with HIV infection from a south American hospital;anthropometric measures of central adiposity in the evaluation of metabolic syndrome in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies;anti RO 52/60 antibodies and their clinical serological correlation. single center descriptive study;safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and CHADOX1 vaccines against SARS-COV-2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Brazilian multicentric study;and effect of ABO and RH blood type on SARS-COV-2 infection severity in patients with rheumatic diseases: data from the national SAR-COVID registry.

Sars-Cov-2 Vaccination Coverage in a Mexican Population with Rheumatic Disease

Objectives: Latest recommendation on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRD) by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) is 3 doses while the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends 5 doses. Method(s): We performed a cross-sectional study from April to November 2022 about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in an outpatient rheumatology clinic in northeast Mexico. Consecutive SRD patients with a history of COVID-19 vaccination were invited to participate. Patients without SRD were excluded. Eligible participants completed a survey that included demographic data (age, sex, rheumatic disease diagnosis) and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination history (number of doses, and type of vaccine). Result(s): We recruited 252 patients.Vaccine types administered were: BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) 55 (23.11%);ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) 130 (54.62%);Ad5-nCoV (CanSinoBIO) 31 (13.03%);Coronavac (Sinovac) 9 (3.78%);mRNA-1273 (Moderna)13 (5.46%). (See Table 1 and Table 2) Conclusion(s): Two thirds of our patients met SARS-CoV-2 vaccination recommendations by ACR and EULAR and 5.95% met CDC criteria. Population without any dose represents 6.74%. SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated patients with SRD is associated with a better outcome compared with unvaccinated. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage need to be done.

Safety of the Vaccine against Sars-Cov-2 in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data from the Safer Study

Objectives: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease which presents infections as one of the most frequent complications, including more severe outcomes of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Immunization of these patients has been strongly recommended, however, data on safety are still scarce. In this study we evaluate the safety after vaccination against SARS-CoV2 in patients with SLE. Method(s): Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease - the 'SAFER' study, is a longitudinal Brazilian multicenter phase IV study. In this study patients with SLE (according to the 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria), older than 18 years who received vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 CoronaVac (Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine), ChadOx-1 (AstraZeneca) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) were included. The evaluation of adverse events (AEs) was done by telephone contact, symptom diaries and a face-to-face visit on the 28th day after each dose. Patients were followed up also by disease activity, assessed using SLEDAI-2 K score. Result(s): A total of 367 individuals with SLE were included, 207 received CoronaVac, 128 received ChadOx-1 and 32 received BNT162b2. Ninety percent of the subjects were female with a mean age of 37 years. About 50% (182) of patients were using oral glucocorticoids and azathioprine was the most frequent immunosuppressive therapy. Regarding disease activity parameters, 38%(140) of patients had zero SLEDAI-2Kat baseline and 41%(147) had zero SLEDAI-2 K 28 days after the 2nd dose. After the first and second dose the most frequent AEs were pain at injection site (58%/44%), headache (48%/33%) and pruritus (42%/37%). Comparing the three vaccines, after the first dose, local symptoms, myalgia, and fever were less frequent in patients who received CoronaVac (p alpha 0.001) as well as headache, tiredness (p = 0.001) and arthralgia (p = 0.003). After the second dose, only local symptoms such as pain at the application site and thickening of the skin around the application site were less frequent in the CoronaVac group (p alpha 0.05). Headache, tiredness, musculoskeletal symptoms and fever were more common in patients receiving AstraZeneca. No serious adverse events were reported regardless of the vaccination schedule used. Conclusion(s): This study suggests that vaccines against SARS-COV-2 are safe in SLE patients. Neither severe AEs were reported nor worsening of disease activity were reported. Comparing the different vaccines, CoronaVac had fewer adverse events.

Impact of Glucocorticoid on Immunogenicity among Covid-19 Vaccines in Immune-Mediated Diseases

Objectives: The use of glucocorticoids (GC) has been associated with increased risk of hospitalization for coronavirus infection and reduced immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in immune-mediated diseases (IMD) patients. However, there is still controversy of which dose of GC is correlated with impaired vaccine response on each of the diverse COVID-19 vaccines available, as well as the possible influence of other concurrent immunosuppressants. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of GC on serological response after two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech), CoronaVac (inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine) and ChadOx1 (AstraZeneca) and after the booster dose in patients with IMD. Method(s): The data were extracted from a multicenter longitudinal observational Brazilian cohort (SAFER: Safety and Efficacy on COVID19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease). Patients >18 years of age with IMD were evaluated after 2 doses of the same vaccine against COVID-19 and after a booster vaccine, applied according to Brazilian National Immunization Program. All patients underwent clinical examination and collected blood samples for immunogenicity tests. Serological response was evaluated by Anti-RBD titers (IgG) at baseline and 4 weeks after each vaccine dose. Result(s): Among the 1009 patients evaluated, 301 were using GC (196/401 SLE, 52/199 RA and 27/74 vasculitis). Patients using GC were younger (38.2 vs 40,8 years, p = 0,002), had higherBMI (27,6 vs 26,4 p = 0,008), higher prevalence of kidney disease (3,3% vs 0,5%, p = 0,001) and of thrombosis (11,6% vs 5,9%, p = 0,002) than non-users. Regarding the type of vaccine, most of the GC users received CoronaVac (61.7%), while only 31.9%of non-users received this vaccine (p alpha 0.001). Although there were similar rates of pre-vaccination infections among them, patients with GC tended to have a higher incidence of confirmed COVID-19 infection after the 2nd dose of the vaccine compared to non-users (4.5% vs 2.0% p = 0.054). The antibody titers after the 1st dose of COVID-19 vaccines were similar between groups, but there was a worse response in the GC group after the 2nd dose (p = 0.039). However, this difference was not statistically significant after the 3rd dose (Figure). Conclusion(s): GC use may compromise vaccine-induced immunogenicity after a 2-dose regimen;however, this effect does not remain significant after the booster dose. Multivariate analysis is still pending to assess the potential difference in the impact of GC on the immune response depending on GC dose, type of vaccine and associated drugs.

Evaluation of Homologous and Heterologous Vaccine against Sars-Cov-2 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: Data from Safer Study

Objectives: To evaluate the immunogenicity of ChAdOx1, Coronavac and BNT162B2 vaccines in SLE patients, including homologous and heterologous immunizations. Method(s): The 'Safety and efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease-SAFER study' is a Brazilian multicentric longitudinal phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 Vaccine in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) in real life, started on May 2021. SLE patients (according to the 2012 SLICC classification criteria), older than 18 years of age were recruited after 2 or 3 doses of vaccine against COVID-19 (ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and CoronaVac) and were evaluated at baseline and on the 28th day after each dose. Homologous immunization was considered if they received three doses of the same vaccine and heterologous if a different one was applied. IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain were measured by chemiluminescence (SARS-CoV-2-IgG-II Quant assay, Abbott-Laboratories) at baseline and 28 days after the first, 2nd and 3rd doses (Seropositivity IgGSpike>= 7.1BAU/mL). Statistical analysis: ANOVA and pairwise comparisons tests Results: 316 SLE patients were included (255 heterologous and 61 homologous immunization), 89.2% were female and the mean age was 37.6 +/- 11.2 years. The two groups were homogeneous regarding demographical data, disease activity and immunosuppressive treatment. 49.7% used corticosteroids (alpha 5 mg/day in 52.3%), 83.5% antimalarials, 22.8% azathioprine and 20.3% mycophenolate mofetil. 207 patients received the first two doses with CoronaVac, 128 ChadOx-1 and 32 BNT162b2. Regarding the first two doses of the same vaccine, there was no difference in IgG titers over time between CoronaVac or ChadOx-1 (p = 0.313). IgG titers increased in all vaccine groups, with difference only after 2nd dose: 4.96 +/- 1.71BAU/mL CoronaVac vs. 6.00 +/- 1.99BAU/mL ChadOx-1 vs. 7.31 +/- 1.49BAU/mL BNT162b2 (p alpha 0.001). There was no difference in IgG titers over time between homologous or heterologous vaccine schedule (p = 0.872). IgG titers also increased in all groups, with difference only after 2nd dose: 5.49 +/- 1.96BAU/mL heterologous vs. 6.30 +/- 2.10BAU/mL homologous (p = 0.009). Conclusion(s): Induction of immunogenicity occurred in different vaccine regimens in SLE patients. Future research to explore different heterologous schemes in IMRD must be performed.

SARS-CoV-2 Alpha Variant Infection of a Patient Immunized by Inactive Sinovac (CoronaVac) Vaccine

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first detected in December 2019, and shortly after pandemic has been declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) due to its unstoppable global spread. Considerable amount of effort has beenput around the World in order to develop a safe and effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Inactivated and RNA vaccines have already passed phase three studies showing sufficient efficacy and safety, respectively. Nowadays, there is a noticeable dominance of SARS-CoV-2 variants with various mutations over the wild type SARS-CoV-2. However, there is no report showing the efficacy of these vaccines on these variants. This case study describes a thirty-eight-year-old male reported to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 alpha variant following two doses of inactive CoronaVac administration with a protective level of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. The variant analysis of the virus reported to be positive for N501Y mutation.This is the first case in the literature demonstrating that inactive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine might have a lower efficacy on alpha variant.Copyright © 2022 Cenk Serhan Ozverel et al., published by Sciendo.

Safety surveillance of covid-19 vaccines using large-linked database

In the global drive to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2, millions of people have received at least one dose of a COVID- 19 vaccine. Vaccination safety is the key to the success of immunisation programs and in combating vaccine hesitancy among the public. Post-licensure safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines is essential to detect rare or severe vaccine-associated adverse events in the population and provide ongoing data of safety issues. Passive surveillance is the primary method most widely used to collect adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) via voluntary reporting. Monitoring through active surveillance is strongly encouraged to improve vaccine safety monitoring and provide more robust data. The SAFECOVAC project was initiated to evaluate risk of serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. It leverages on the availability of nationwide COVID- 19 vaccine registry, hospital admission database, and other data sources to create a large-linked database. Uniquely for Malaysia, diverse vaccine portfolio was used and we are able to compare the risk estimate for the three major vaccine types of different platform i.e., mRNA-based vaccine (BNT162b2), inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac), and adenovirus vector-based vaccine (ChAdOx1). Current data shows that safety of COVID-19 vaccine is assured and findings are fairly consistent with data from other countries.

SARS-CoV-2 COLLECTIVE IMMUNITY AMONG THE POPULATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA

Background. The COVID-19 pandemic has become a substantial global health crisis, unparalleled in world history. Infection dynamics can have specific characteristics in different countries due to social, economic, climatic, or geographic factors. Aim(s): to study features of SARS-CoV-2 collective immunity among the Armenian population. Materials and methods. A cross-sectional, randomized study of collective immunity was carried out according to a program developed by Rospotrebnadzor and the St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute, taking into account WHO recommendations. The study was approved by the ethics committees of the National Center for Infectious Diseases (Armenia) and the St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute (Russia). A volunteer cohort was formed (N = 6057), randomized by age and region. The study's analysis included: shares and distributions of antibodies (Abs) to nucleocapsid (Nc) antigen (Ag) and receptor binding domain (RBD) S-1 Ag in the cohort;and quantitative determination of these Abs by ELISA. During the survey, a history of vaccination was indicated by 4395 people. Results. Overall seropositivity formed in the whole cohort (by April 14, 2022) was 98.6% (95% CI: 98.1-98.7). It did not depend on age, place of residence, or occupation. When quantifying Nc and RBD Abs, the proportions of volunteers with Nc Ab levels of 1-17 BAU/ml and RBD Ab levels of 22.6-220 BAU/ml were the smallest, amounting to 6.9% (95% CI: 6.2-7.5) and 20.4% (95% CI: 19.4-21.4), respectively. With increasing serum concentrations (Nc > 667 BAU/ml, RBD > 450 BAU/ml), the proportions of individuals with the corresponding levels were 20.2% for Nc (95% CI: 19.2-21.3) and 54.2% for RBD (95% CI: 52.9-55.5). Vaccination coverage was 72.6% (95% CI: 71.5-73.7). The most frequently used were Sinopharm/BIBP (32.4%), AZD1222 (22.3%), and Gam-COVID-Vac (21%). The remaining vaccines (CoronaVac, mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, CoviVac) were used by 24.3% of vaccinated individuals. When summing vaccines by platform, it was found that: vector vaccines were used in 40.34% (95% CI: 33.57-42.39) of cases;whole-virion vaccines were used in 26.83% (95% CI: 24.76-32.20);and mRNA vaccines were used in 6.33% (95% CI: 4.84-8.91). Conclusion. The epidemic situation in Armenia by April 2022 was characterized by a high level of collective immunity, independent of age or regional factors. Vector and whole-virion vaccines have been used most widely.Copyright © Popova A.Yu. et al., 2023.

Navigating through administrative data to evaluate realworld effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in Malaysia: The RECoVaM experience

Real-world effectiveness studies are important for monitoring the performance of COVID-19 vaccination strategies and informing COVID-19 prevention and control policies. The Real-World Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccine under the Malaysian National COVID-19 Immunisation Program (RECoVaM) analysed effectiveness of a range of homologous primary, as well as heterologous and homologous booster COVID-19 vaccines, which comprised of BNT162b2 (mRNA), CoronaVac (inactivated) and AZD1222 (viral vectored), against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19. Nationally comprehensive administrative data at both individual- and aggregate-levels were consolidated for each analysis. These were the Malaysia national COVID-19 vaccinations register (MyVAS), COVID-19 cases line listing, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions register, deaths line listing, supervised test registry (SIMKA), and the MySejahtera check-ins-based automated contact tracing registry (AutoTrace). RECoVaM adopted several observational study designs. Exposure periods were carefully calibrated to account for the structure of Malaysia's COVID-19 data, and epidemiological context, to estimate vaccine effectiveness. Importantly, RECoVaM also compared effectiveness measures during both the Delta-dominant, and Omicron-dominant periods. Effectiveness estimates for primary vaccinations showed a reduction in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections by 87 - 91%, and symptomatic infections by 85 - 89%, as well as ICU admission by 82 - 84% among COVID-19 cases, and death by 86 - 88% among COVID-19 cases. All vaccine platforms were effective in reducing risk against ICU admission and death. Subsequently, significant waning of protection was demonstrated against COVID-19 infection among BNT162b2 (90.8 to 79.3%) and CoronaVac (74.5 to 30.4%) recipients 3 to 5 months post-primary vaccinations. Protection against ICU admission for CoronaVac waned (56.0 to 28.7%) and was more substantial among the elderly (aged 60 years and above). The estimates of marginal Vaccine Effectiveness (mVE) for boosters showed that recipients of booster doses were at least 90% less likely to be infected with COVID-19 relative to primary BNT162b2 vaccination during the Delta-dominant period. In both Delta and Omicron-dominant periods, homologous BNT162b2 boosting offered the highest protection against infection relative to primary BNT162b2 vaccination. This is followed by heterologous boosting with either AZD1222 or BNT162b2 for recipients primed with CoronaVac or AZD1222, and finally homologous boosting with AZD1222 and CoronaVac. The mVE estimates for all booster combinations in the Omicrondominant period was about half that of Delta. Vaccination with a primary COVID-19 vaccines were effective in reducing COVID-19 infection but wanes after 3-5 months. Additional booster doses were more effective than primary series alone in preventing COVID-19 infection but demonstrated an interplay of immune evasion during the Omicron-dominant period. Homologous BNT162b2 boosting aside, and heterologous boosting appeared to be more protective than homologous boosting. Although vaccination is still protective against severe infection, ongoing community transmission could facilitate viral mutation. Next generation, multivalent vaccines aimed at stemming transmission, are warranted.

Hesitancy, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the mRNA and whole-virus inactivated Covid-19 vaccines in pediatric neuromuscular diseases.

The mRNA-based BNT162b2 and inactivated whole-virus CoronaVac are two widely used COVID-19 vaccines that confer immune protection to healthy individuals. However, hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccination appeared to be common for patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) due to the paucity of data on the safety and efficacy in this high-risk patient population. Therefore, we examined the underlying factors associated with vaccine hesitancy across time for NMDs and assessed the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of these two vaccines. Patients aged 8-18 years with no cognitive delay were invited to complete surveys in January and April 2022. Patients aged 2-21 years were enrolled for COVID-19 vaccination between June 2021 and April 2022, and they recorded adverse reactions (ARs) for 7 days after vaccination. Peripheral blood was obtained before and within 49 days after vaccination to measure serological antibody responses compared to healthy children and adolescents. Forty-one patients completed vaccine hesitancy surveys for both timepoints, while 22 joined the reactogenicity and immunogenicity arm of the study. Two or more family members vaccinated against COVID-19 was positively associated with intention of vaccination (odds ratio 11.7, 95% CI 1.81-75.1, p = .010). Pain at the injection site, fatigue, and myalgia were the commonest ARs. Most ARs were mild (75.5%, n = 71/94). All 19 patients seroconverted against the wildtype SARS-CoV-2 after two doses of either vaccine, similar to 280 healthy counterparts. There was lower neutralization against the Omicron BA.1 variant. BNT162b2 and CoronaVac were safe and immunogenic for patients with NMDs, even in those on low-dose corticosteroids.

Waning effectiveness against COVID-19-related hospitalization, severe complications, and mortality with two to three doses of CoronaVac and BNT162b2: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate waning effectiveness against severe and fatal COVID-19 with two to three doses of CoronaVac/BNT162b2, where data are limited. METHODS: A case-control study included individuals aged ≥18 years, unvaccinated or received two to three doses of CoronaVac/BNT162b2, using electronic healthcare databases in Hong Kong. Those with first COVID-19-related hospitalization, severe complications, or mortality between 1 January and 15 August 2022 were defined as cases and matched with up-to-10 controls by age, sex, index date, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19-related outcomes was estimated at different time intervals from second and third-dose vaccination (0-13 up-to 210-240 days) using conditional logistic regression adjusted for comorbidities and medications. RESULTS: By 211-240 days after second dose, VE against COVID-19-related hospitalization reduced to 46.6% (40.7-51.8%) for BNT162b2 and 36.2% (28.0-43.4%) for CoronaVac, and VE against COVID-19-related mortality were 73.8% (55.9-84.4%) and 76.6% (60.8-86.0%). After third dose, VE against COVID-19-related hospitalization decreased from 91.2% (89.5-92.6%) for BNT162b2 and 76.7% (73.7-79.4%) for CoronaVac at 0-13 days, to 67.1% (60.4-72.6%) and 51.3% (44.2-57.5%) at 91-120 days. VE against COVID-19-related mortality for BNT162b2 remained high from 0-13 days [98.2% (95.0-99.3%)] to 91-120 days [94.6% (77.7-98.7%)], and for CoronaVac reduced from 0-13 days [96.7% (93.2-98.4%)] to 91-120 days [86.4% (73.3-93.1%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Significant risk reduction against COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality after CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccination was observed for >240 and >120 days after second and third doses compared to unvaccinated, despite significant waning over time. Timely administration of booster doses could provide higher levels of protection.